GENERAL & COMMERCIAL LAWYERS | SYDNEY | NORWEST BUSINESS PARK| BAULKHAM HILLS
©
“Forward Thinking, Experienced, Resolute”
Fraud is a very serious allegation, and
accordingly the civil standard of proof is much
higher. The evidence must accord with the
ruling in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60
CLR 336 - Dixon J at 362:
“The truth is that, when the law requires the
proof of any fact, the tribunal must feel an
actual persuasion of its occurrence or existence
before it can be found....It is often said that such
an issue as fraud must be proved “clearly”,
“unequivocally”, “strictly” or “with certainty”
(Cf. Mowatt v. Blake3; Kisch v. Central Railway
Co. of Venezuela Ltd.4; Lumley v.
Desborough5). This does not mean that some
standard of persuasion is fixed intermediate
between the satisfaction beyond reasonable
doubt required upon a criminal inquest and the
reasonable satisfaction which in a civil issue
may, not must, be based on a preponderance of
probability. It means that the nature of the issue
necessarily affects the process by which
reasonable satisfaction is attained. When, in a
civil proceeding, a question arises whether a
crime has been committed, the standard of
persuasion is, according to the better opinion,
the same as upon other civil issues... But,
consistently with this opinion, weight is given
to the presumption of innocence and exactness
of proof is expected.”
Fraud can be difficult to prove so keep a close watch on
your financial statements and property title deeds, or you
may have been mislead or deceived. If you suspect fraud,
contact us.
Mortgage fraud may include inflated property valuations,
false information, false financial and employment details,
fraudulent loan applications, corrupt in house banking
employees, and other complex scheme and arrangements
involving mortgage brokers.
In Cornell’s case, the employee Cornell was charged with
various offences, including claims that she assisted people
to take out loans of $3.9 million using fake information. As
a former employee at St George Bank, Cornell allegedly
solicited a third party, and bribed an employee of the
National Australia Bank for the purpose
of influencing a loan approval.
A Mortgage Broker in another case submitted a false loan
application to the Bank, which included false information
regarding the mortgagee’s employment. A third person
then befriended the mortgagee and obtained joint access to
the loan account. Upon payment of the loan amount, the
third person immediately withdrew that amount and
disappeared. After a period of 2 years of litigation, the
Bank agreed to return the property to the mortgagee in this
case, and pay all of the legal costs incurred.
Fraud may relate to any type of services or information.
RESOLUTE LAWYERS
& Associates